[PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

Tabi Timur-B04825 B04825 at freescale.com
Fri Sep 2 08:37:47 EST 2011

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other
>> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc.  Use the core name to be
>> consistent going forward.
> Why are we not using the generic names recommendation?
> Is the "PowerPC" vendor string still appropriate here, or should we use
> "fsl"?

And what about a compatible property?

Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list