RFC: ESR_I/DLK processing
Jimi Xenidis
jimix at pobox.com
Sat Oct 29 07:43:52 EST 2011
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S has the following code:
> /* Data Storage Interrupt */
> START_EXCEPTION(DataStorage)
> NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG
> mfspr r5,SPRN_ESR /* Grab the ESR, save it, pass arg3 */
> stw r5,_ESR(r11)
> mfspr r4,SPRN_DEAR /* Grab the DEAR, save it, pass arg2 */
> andis. r10,r5,(ESR_ILK|ESR_DLK)@h
> bne 1f
> EXC_XFER_EE_LITE(0x0300, handle_page_fault)
> 1:
> addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> EXC_XFER_EE_LITE(0x0300, CacheLockingException)
I need something similar for A2 (and all book3e) and was wondering, why this isn't just:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> index 88abe70..8451822 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,14 @@ int __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E
> + if (error_code & (ESR_DLK|ESR_ILK)) {
> + /* detect that this is a privileged op and SIGILL */
> + _exception(SIGILL, regs, ILL_PRVOPC, regs->nip);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (notify_page_fault(regs))
> return 0;
Its not like this need to be fast or anything.
I'd be happy to submit a patch that adds to fault.c and removed the I/DLK processing from head_fsl_booke.S
Thoughts?
-jx
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list