[PATCH 03/13] powerpc: Fix booke hugetlb preload code for PPC_MM_SLICES and 64-bit
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Nov 29 03:01:06 EST 2011
On Nov 24, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 15:50 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote:
>
> .../...
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES
>> - psize = mmu_get_tsize(get_slice_psize(mm, ea));
>> - tsize = mmu_get_psize(psize);
>> + psize = get_slice_psize(mm, ea);
>> + tsize = mmu_get_tsize(psize);
>> shift = mmu_psize_defs[psize].shift;
>> #else
>> - vma = find_vma(mm, ea);
>> - psize = vma_mmu_pagesize(vma); /* returns actual size in bytes */
>> - asm (PPC_CNTLZL "%0,%1" : "=r" (lz) : "r" (psize));
>> - shift = 31 - lz;
>> - tsize = 21 - lz;
>> + psize = vma_mmu_pagesize(find_vma(mm, ea));
>> + shift = __ilog2(psize);
>> + tsize = shift - 10;
>> #endif
>
> Now, I know it was already there and you are just moving it around in
> this patch but come on ... find_vma() here ? Really ? And with no result
> checking nor boundary checking (remember it can return a vma that
> doesn't enclose the address etc....). Now I know in this specific case
> it -should- be safe but still...
>
> Now, the caller is just doing:
>
> book3e_hugetlb_preload(vma->vm_mm, address, *ptep);
>
> So why not just change the prototype and pass the vma down instead ?
Can we do this on top of the patchset instead of changing the existing patchset?
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list