[PATCH] net: fsl_pq_mdio: fix non tbi phy access
Baruch Siach
baruch at tkos.co.il
Wed Nov 16 02:44:24 EST 2011
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:06:03AM -0600, Andy Fleming wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:04:47PM +0000, Fleming Andy-AFLEMING wrote:
[snip]
> >> And looking at the p1010si.dtsi, I see that it's automatically there for
> >> you.
> >>
> >> How were you breaking?
> >
> > Adding linuxppc to Cc.
> >
> > My board is P1011 based, the single core version of P1020, not P1010. In
> > p1020si.dtsi I see no tbi node. In p1020rdb.dts I see a tbi node but only for
> > mdio at 25000, not mdio at 24000, which is what I'm using.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Well, that's a bug. In truth, the silicon dtsi trees should not have tbi
> nodes, as that's highly machine-specific. The p1020rdb is apparently relying
> on the old behavior, which is broken, and due to the fact that the first
> ethernet interface doesn't *use* the TBI PHY.
>
> You should add this to your board tree:
>
> mdio at 24000 {
>
> tbi0: tbi-phy at 11 {
> reg = <0x11>;
> device_type = "tbi-phy";
> };
> };
>
> And add the PHYs you use, as well as set reg (and the value after the "@")
> to something that makes sense for your board.
Thanks for your detailed explanation and prompt response. I've added a tbi
node, dropped my patch, and now my board works as expected.
> I am going to go right now, and add tbi nodes for all of the Freescale
> platforms. I will also modify the fsl_pq_mdio code to be more explicit about
> its reason for failure.
Please Cc me on these.
Thanks,
baruch
--
~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list