[RFC PATCH 16/17] powerpc/e500: Make __setup_cpu_{e200, e500, e500mc, e5500} optional

[Kumar Gala]

On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Scott Wood wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:07:14PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Only build the setup functions when the corresponding entries are
>> included in the CPU table.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett at boeing.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S |   14 +++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S
>> index 8053db0..77721b2 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>> #include <asm/cputable.h>
>> #include <asm/ppc_asm.h>
>> 
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_E500_V1_V2) || defined(CONFIG_FSL_E500MC) \
>> +		|| defined(CONFIG_FSL_E5500)
> 
> This seems like the kind of thing that CONFIG_E500 should be retained
> for.
> 
> -Scott

Agreed, we should define CONFIG_E500 as internal and used for common functionality between E500, E500MC, E5500, E6500.

- k