[RFC][PATCH 08/30] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1020 SoC device tree

Scott Wood scottwood at freescale.com
Fri Nov 11 05:05:42 EST 2011

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:13:51AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Split the P1020 SoC device tree into what we can include as a 'prefix'
> to the board device tree and what needs to be included as a 'postfix'.
> This allows use more re-use and less duplication between various board
> device tree configurations (32-bit address map vs 36-bit address map).

Could you elaborate on the issues that require this pre/post approach?

What does the SoC part need to specify that has to override or go within
something the board specifies?


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list