[PATCH 5/7] fsl_pmc: update device bindings
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Sat Nov 5 07:19:47 EST 2011
On 11/04/2011 03:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 07:36 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
>> + "fsl,p1022-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is
>> + compatible, and implies lossless Ethernet capability during sleep.
>>
>> "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is
>> compatible; all statements below that apply to "fsl,mpc8548-pmc" also
>> apply to "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc".
>>
>> Compatibility does not include bit assignments in SCCR/PMCDR/DEVDISR; these
>> - bit assignments are indicated via the sleep specifier in each device's
>> - sleep property.
>> + bit assignments are indicated via the clock nodes. Device which has a
>> + controllable clock source should have a "clk-handle" property pointing
>> + to the clock node.
>
> Do we have any code to use this?
>
> Normally that shouldn't matter, but we already an unused binding for
> this. :-)
>
> Please provide rationale for doing it this way. Ideally it should
> probably use whatever http://devicetree.org/ClockBindings ends up being.
OK, I see the code now. Still could use some explanation.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list