[PATCH 0/13] Hypervisor-mode KVM on POWER7
Alexander Graf
agraf at suse.de
Sun May 22 04:15:31 EST 2011
On 21.05.2011, at 19:00, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 21.05.2011, at 18:41, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19.05.2011, at 07:22, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 02:42:08PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 05/17/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What would be the path for these patches to get upstream? Would this
>>>>>> stuff normally go through Avi's tree? There is a bit of a
>>>>>> complication in that they are based on Ben's next branch. Would Avi
>>>>>> pull Ben's next branch, or would they go in via Ben's tree?
>>>>>
>>>>> Usually the ppc tree gets merged into Avi's tree and goes on from
>>>>> there. When we have interdependencies, we can certainly do it
>>>>> differently though. We can also shove them through Ben's tree this
>>>>> time around, as there are more dependencies on ppc code than KVM
>>>>> code.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, both options are fine. If it goes through kvm.git I can merge
>>>> Ben's tree (provided it is append-only) and apply the kvm-ppc
>>>> patches on top.
>>>
>>> OK, the easiest thing is for them to go via Ben's tree, I think, since
>>> they depend so much on other stuff in Ben's tree.
>>>
>>> Alex, could you give Ben an acked-by for patches 1-8 of the series?
>>> There haven't been any changes requested for them.
>>
>> With ben's tree merged into avi's tree and your patches applied on top, MOL breaks. I'll have to track down why exactly though.
>
> In fact, qemu-system-ppc64 -enable-kvm also breaks.
Only ben's tree merged into avi's tree works fine. So it's definitely one of your patches from 1-8 (except for 2,3 which are already in Ben's tree).
Alex
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list