[PATCH] POWER: perf_event: Skip updating kernel counters if register value shrinks

[Eric B Munson]

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 10:25 -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > Here I made the assumption that the hardware would never remove more events in
> > a speculative roll back than it had added.  This is not a situation I
> > encoutered in my limited testing, so I didn't think underflow was possible.  I
> > will send out a V2 using the signed 32 bit delta and remeber to CC stable
> > this time. 
> 
> I'm not thinking about underflow but rollover... or that isn't possible
> with those counters ? IE. They don't wrap back to 0 after hitting
> ffffffff ?
> 

They do roll over to 0 after ffffffff, but I thought that case was already
covered by the perf_event_interrupt.  Are you concerned that we will reset a
counter and speculative roll back will underflow that counter?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20110330/ba913f43/attachment.pgp>