[regression] 3.0-rc boot failure -- bisected to cd4ea6ae3982
a.p.zijlstra at chello.nl
Thu Jul 21 02:42:57 EST 2011
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 09:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra at chello.nl> wrote:
> > Right, so we can either merge my scary patches now and have 3.0 boot on
> > 16+ node machines (and risk breaking something), or delay them until
> > 3.0.1 and have 16+ node machines suffer a little.
> So how much impact does your scary patch have on machines that don't
> have multiple nodes? If it's a "the code isn't even called by normal
> machines" kind of setup, I don't think I care a lot.
Hmm, it does get called, but it looks relatively straight forward to
make it so that it doesn't. Let me try that.
Yes, the below works nicely (on top of the previous two).
Built and boot tested on a single-node and multi-node x86_64.
Subject: sched: Avoid creating superfluous domains
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra at chello.nl>
Date: Wed Jul 20 18:34:30 CEST 2011
When creating sched_domains, stop when we've covered the entire target
span instead of continuing to create domains, only to later find
they're redundant and throw them away again.
This avoids single node systems from touching funny NUMA sched_domain
Requested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra at chello.nl>
kernel/sched.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
@@ -7436,6 +7436,8 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const str
sd = build_sched_domain(tl, &d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
if (tl->flags & SDTL_OVERLAP || sched_feat(FORCE_SD_OVERLAP))
sd->flags |= SD_OVERLAP;
+ if (cpumask_equal(cpu_map, sched_domain_span(sd)))
More information about the Linuxppc-dev