[PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users
broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Tue Feb 8 01:50:31 EST 2011
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:44:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:18:29 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> > Do you mean that these systems require CONFIG_PM be turned off, or just
> > that people tend not to turn it on? If the latter would you expect any
> > ill effects from doing so?
> I don't know the answer to either question without testing. All I am
> saying is that currently the default for CONFIG_PM is "off" and you are
> changing it to be "on" and there may not have been any testing done of
> that in some situations. We don't know where it was explicitly
> turned off any more since we shrank our defconfig files (which was done
> automatically) ... since it is off by default, it doesn't need to be
> mentioned in a defconfig unless it needs to be turned on.
My suspicion would be that it'll have been turned off by someone hitting
return through a config upgrade rather than through deliberate effort.
On the other hand if it is essential for some machines to have it
disabled they probably want to have somethnig in Kconfig.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev