[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: clean up FPGA device tree nodes for Freecsale QorIQ boards
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Aug 31 13:05:43 EST 2011
On Aug 30, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
>>
>>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> Do we really want the generic "fsl,fpga-cpld"& "fsl,fpga-pixis"? This seems to vague.
>>>
>>> Yes, the PIXIS is generally register compatible across all boards. There
>>> may be some minor differences, but the OCM driver can work with all PIXIS
>>> boards that have an PIXIS.
>>
>> Is this true? Don't we have pixis and ngpixis in u-boot?
>
> I forgot about that. Well, everything I said is true about the ngpixis,
> so I guess I should use "ngpixis" instead of just "pixis" here. I'll have
> to check if the old pixis can be used this way.
>
>>
>>>> Also you need "pixis" on MPC8544DS, MPC8572DS, MPC8536DS.
>>>
>>> Ok.
>>>
>>>> Also fpga-cpld makes no sense if we keep this. You are either a CPLD or FPGA not both.
>>>
>>> Then I don't understand what the CPLD is.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_programmable_logic_device
>
> Ok, I get it now. Is there a name for the CPLD we use on these chips?
> I'm having a hard time getting proper documentation on the CPLD. York
> expressed similar frustration.
>
> Perhaps these should be called board-control devices. How about
>
> fsl,boardcontrol-cpld
> fsl,boardcontrol-ngpixis
> fsl,boardcontrol-qixis
For the CPLD based boards I think:
<BOARDNAME>-cpld is best as there isn't really much consistent right now.
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list