[PATCH] mtd-utils: fix corrupt cleanmarker with flash_erase -j command
LiuShuo
b35362 at freescale.com
Wed Aug 17 17:35:34 EST 2011
于 2011年08月16日 23:06, Artem Bityutskiy 写道:
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:50 +0800, b35362 at freescale.com wrote:
>> From: Liu Shuo<b35362 at freescale.com>
>>
>> Flash_erase -j should fill discrete freeoob areas with required bytes
>> of JFFS2 cleanmarker in jffs2_check_nand_cleanmarker(). Not just fill
>> the first freeoob area.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo<b35362 at freescale.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Yang<leoli at freescale.com>
> ...
>
>> /*
>> * Process user arguments
>> @@ -197,15 +198,40 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> if (ioctl(fd, MEMGETOOBSEL,&oobinfo) != 0)
>> return sys_errmsg("%s: unable to get NAND oobinfo", mtd_device);
>>
>> + cleanmarker.totlen = cpu_to_je32(8);
>> /* Check for autoplacement */
>> if (oobinfo.useecc == MTD_NANDECC_AUTOPLACE) {
>> + struct nand_ecclayout_user ecclayout;
>> /* Get the position of the free bytes */
>> - if (!oobinfo.oobfree[0][1])
>> + if (ioctl(fd, ECCGETLAYOUT,&ecclayout) != 0)
>> + return sys_errmsg("%s: unable to get NAND ecclayout", mtd_device);
>> +
> Hmm, shouldn't we instead make MTD_OOB_AUTO be available for userspace
> via an ioctl instead and make flash_eraseall use it instead?
>
I think We can add a new ioctl MEMSETOOBMODE for selecting a mode to
access the OOB area.
Add new member into struct mtd_info:
struct mtd_info {
......
enum {
MTD_OOB_PLACE,
MTD_OOB_AUTO,
MTD_OOB_RAW,
} oob_mode;
}
In function mtd_do_writeoob() (in drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c) :
- ops.mode = MTD_OOB_PLACE;
+ ops.mode = mtd->oob_mode;
Could we do it like this ?
Thanks
-LiuShuo
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list