[PATCH 5/5] [powerpc] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Aug 11 00:52:07 EST 2011


On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:

> I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble.  I am getting
> ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
> right as possible.
> 
> I think I should reword the commit message to indicate we are removing
> the Documentation/.../fsl-flexcan.txt file which has essentially become
> empty and change the p1010si.dtsi file's can nodes to "fsl,p1010-flexcan",
> "fsl,flexcan".  Is that correct?
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin

This is wrong.  Again, what binding covers "fsl,flexcan" if you remove fsl-flexcan.txt:

[galak at right powerpc]$ git grep flexcan Documentation/devicetree/bindings
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt:fsl,flexcan-v1.0 nodes
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt:- fsl,flexcan-clock-source : CAN Engine Clock Source.This property selects
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt:- fsl,flexcan-clock-divider : for the reference and system clock, an additional
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt:      - v1.0 of flexcan-v1.0 represent the IP block version for P1010 SOC.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt:              compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt:              fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt:              fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;

Not seeing anything that covers it.

I think the issue should be resolved by patching fsl-flexcan.txt to remove wording or update it.

- k


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list