[PATCH] mm: Check we have the right vma in __access_remote_vm()
Andrew Morton
akpm at linux-foundation.org
Tue Apr 12 09:50:35 EST 2011
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:24:01 +1000 (EST)
Michael Ellerman <michael at ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> In __access_remote_vm() we need to check that we have found the right
> vma, not the following vma, before we try to access it. Otherwise we
> might call the vma's access routine with an address which does not
> fall inside the vma.
>
hm, mysteries. Does this patch fix any known problem in any known
kernel, or was the problem discovered by inspection, or what?
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 9da8cab..ce999ca 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3678,7 +3678,7 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
> vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> - if (!vma)
> + if (!vma || vma->vm_start > addr)
> break;
> if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->access)
> ret = vma->vm_ops->access(vma, addr, buf,
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list