mmotm threatens ppc preemption again
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Apr 1 07:38:38 EST 2011
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:21 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> No, its the same accessors for both, since the need to distinguish them
> hasn't really come up. Could you put a "if (preemptable()) return;"
> guard in your implementations?
That would be a band-aid but would probably do the trick for now
for !-rt, tho it wouldn't do the right thing for -rt...
> Otherwise I have no objections to passing the mm in (we'll probably just
> continue to ignore the arg in x86-land).
More information about the Linuxppc-dev