[v1 PATCH] ucc_geth: fix ethtool set ring param bug

[Ben Hutchings]

On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 23:48 +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:11:47PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 08:50 +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:42:30PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:43 +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> > > > > It's common sense that when we should do change to driver ring
> > > > > desc/buffer etc only after 'stop/shutdown' the device. When we
> > > > > do change while devices/driver is running, kernel oops occur:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > -	ug_info->bdRingLenRx[queue] = ring->rx_pending;
> > > > > -	ug_info->bdRingLenTx[queue] = ring->tx_pending;
> > > > > -
> > > > >  	if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> > > > > -		/* FIXME: restart automatically */
> > > > > -		printk(KERN_INFO
> > > > > -			"Please re-open the interface.\n");
> > > > > +		u16 rx_t;
> > > > > +		u16 tx_t;
> > > > > +		printk(KERN_INFO "Stopping interface %s.\n", netdev->name);
> > > > > +		ucc_geth_close(netdev);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		rx_t = ug_info->bdRingLenRx[queue];
> > > > > +		tx_t = ug_info->bdRingLenTx[queue];
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		ug_info->bdRingLenRx[queue] = ring->rx_pending;
> > > > > +		ug_info->bdRingLenTx[queue] = ring->tx_pending;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		printk(KERN_INFO "Reactivating interface %s.\n", netdev->name);
> > > > > +		ret = ucc_geth_open(netdev);
> > > > > +		if (ret) {
> > > > > +			printk(KERN_WARNING "uec_set_ringparam: set ring param for running"
> > > > > +					" interface %s failed. Please try to make the interface "
> > > > > +					" down, then try again.\n", netdev->name);
> > > > > +			ug_info->bdRingLenRx[queue] = rx_t;
> > > > > +			ug_info->bdRingLenTx[queue] = tx_t;
> > > > > +		}
> > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > Bringing the interface down will call ucc_geth_close(), which will try
> > > > to free resources that have not been allocated!
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I did not understand you on this point. There is no
> > > ucc_geth_close when 'open fail'. What you mean here exactly?
> > [...]
> > 
> > Read your own warning.
> 
> So the warning is mis-leading... We may not need it... Still, let's talk
> about the rare case that 'fail of open', may you please show me what is
> the right thing to do 'clean up work' when ever the open fail. Maybe
> dev_close(net_dev)?

I give up.

Just s/ucc_geth_open/dev_open/ and s/ucc_geth_close/dev_close/.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.