[PATCH] powerpc: fix call to subpage_protection()
Michael Ellerman
michael at ellerman.id.au
Fri Nov 19 08:53:03 EST 2010
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 07:24 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 13:32 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > In:=20
> > > powerpc/mm: Fix pgtable cache cleanup with CONFIG_PPC_SUBPAGE_PROT
> > > commit d28513bc7f675d28b479db666d572e078ecf182d
> > > Author: David Gibson <david at gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > >=20
> > > subpage_protection() was changed to to take an mm rather a pgdir but it
> > > didn't change calling site in hashpage_preload(). The change wasn't
> > > noticed at compile time since hashpage_preload() used a void* as the
> > > parameter to subpage_protection().
> > ...=20
> > >=20
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils=
> > _64.c
> > > index 83f534d..5e95844 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> > > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ void hash_preload(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned lo=
> > ng ea,
> > > else
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K */
> > > rc =3D __hash_page_4K(ea, access, vsid, ptep, trap, local, ssiz
> e,
> > > - subpage_protection(pgdir, ea));
> > > + subpage_protection(mm, ea));
> >
> > Type checking is fun :)
> >
> > This is stable material no?
>
> Yes. In the bit you snipped was a:
>
> cc: stable at kernel.org (only 2.6.33 and newer)
Oh right, I thought you actually had to send it to them :D
> Fortunately it's not in 2.6.32 so the bug missed the distros.
Phew.
cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20101119/9bbf33a8/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list