[PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check_e500mc

[Bounine, Alexandre]

Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > [Xie Shaohui-B21989] Hi Alex, seems your suggestion is some kind of
> > conflict with Kumar, you can have a look at
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/67774/
> 
> I think Alex's comment is the fact we ignore the 'return' value in the
machine_check_e500 case.

Yes, this one and plus the fact that Mchk exception messages are printed
even if it was handled successfully (by RIO handler). Messages are
printed in both: e500 and e500mc handlers.

Alex.