[PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support.
Andre Prendel
andre.prendel at gmx.de
Wed May 12 05:03:27 EST 2010
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Jeff Angielski wrote:
Hi Jeff,
A few comments below.
> Add support for reading and writing the n-factor correction
> registers. This is needed to compensate for the characteristics
> of a particular sensor hanging off of the remote channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Angielski <jeff at theptrgroup.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> index 738c472..c9e9855 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum chips { tmp421, tmp422, tmp423 };
>
> static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_MSB[4] = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03 };
> static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_LSB[4] = { 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x13 };
> +static const u8 TMP421_NFACTOR[3] = { 0x21, 0x22, 0x23 };
>
> /* Flags */
> #define TMP421_CONFIG_SHUTDOWN 0x40
> @@ -157,6 +158,38 @@ static ssize_t show_fault(struct device *dev,
> return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
> }
>
> +static ssize_t show_nfactor(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> + s8 nfactor;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + nfactor = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1]);
There should be spaces within the array index, [index - 1].
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", nfactor);
> +}
I'de prefer implementing the sysfs access methods in a consistent way (see other functions). That means adding the nfactor register to the tmp421_data structure and using tmp421_update_device() to update the structure.
> +static ssize_t set_nfactor(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> + int nfactor = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1],
Missing spaces in array index again.
> + SENSORS_LIMIT(nfactor, -128, 127));
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> static mode_t tmp421_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> int n)
> {
> @@ -177,19 +210,28 @@ static mode_t tmp421_is_visible(struct kobject
> *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 0);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 1);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 1);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 1);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 2);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 2);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 2);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 3);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 3);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 3);
>
> static struct attribute *tmp421_attr[] = {
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> NULL
> };
>
Regards,
Andre
PS: CC'ed lm-sensors list
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list