mpc512x uart: testers wanted

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Mon May 3 00:23:22 EST 2010


On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Albrecht Dreß <albrecht.dress at arcor.de> wrote:
> Hi Grant:
>
> Am 27.04.10 20:28 schrieb(en) Albrecht Dreß:
>>>
>>> MPC5121e Hardware Design Guide provides correct info according to my
>>> tests using /16 and /10 prescaler. I've send a new patch with the fixed
>>> comments, unfortunately forgot to mark it as v4, but it is threaded to your
>>> v.3a patch and contains a small changelog, so I hope it is not a problem.
>>
>> Grant?  Is this fine for you, or should I "officially" re-send it?
>
> *ping*
>
> IMHO, this issue can be closed now, as the correct uart operation has been
> verified on both the 512x (Anatolij) and 5200 (me) processors.  Do you
> accept Anatolij's "joint patch" he sent on Apr 26, or is that procedure too
> confusing?  And do we need further Acked-by's?

Yes, I'll pick up Anatolij's patch.  No further work needed by you.

g.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list