Freescale MPC5554 device tree (was: cross-compiling Linux for PowerPC e200 core?)

[Segher Boessenkool]

> In this particular case, we're talking about a part that has never
> previously been described in a device tree.  So, since this is
> something entirely new, what is the value in preserving the
> PowerPC,XXXX style when there isn't any code that will be relying on
> it?

There could be code that matches anything starting with "PowerPC,".
Also, consistency is a good thing no matter what.


Segher