[PATCH 0/4] 8xx: Optimize TLB Miss code.
Heiko Schocher
hs at denx.de
Mon Mar 8 20:06:39 EST 2010
Hello Joakim,
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de> wrote on 2010/03/08 08:46:29:
>> Hello Joakim,
>>
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> [...]
>>> What would be interesting is to skip patch 3 and turn off
>>> MODULES add PIN_TLB and compare that against your unpatched .33 but
>>> with MODULES off and PIN_TLB on
>> run version
>>
>> 1-4 Linux2.6.33-rc without module support and PIN_TLB=on
>> 5-8 Linux2.6.33-rc without module support and PIN_TLB=on + patches 1,2,4
>>
>> L M B E N C H 3 . 0 S U M M A R Y
>> ------------------------------------
>> (Alpha software, do not distribute)
>
> hmm, these results varies a lot. The only stable result I can see is:
>
>> Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better
>> (WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Rand mem Guesses
>> --------- ------------- --- ---- ---- -------- -------- -------
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 184.0 1163.0 No L2 cache?
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 184.0 1164.8 No L2 cache?
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 184.0 1163.2 No L2 cache?
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 183.8 1163.7 No L2 cache?
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.4 173.2 1147.3 No L2 cache?
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.5 173.2 1148.3 No L2 cache?
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.5 173.1 1146.9 No L2 cache?
>> tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.5 173.2 1147.3 No L2 cache?
>
> I don't see why the other results vary so much. Are you using NFS or having much network
> traffic?
I use NFS.
bye
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list