[PATCH 2/2] powerpc/mpc5121: add initial support for PDM360NG board
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Wed Jun 23 07:39:38 EST 2010
On 05/19/2010 04:47 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Scott Wood<scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
>> I believe the only part of this that is new with ePAPR is that it asks that
>> the interrupt controller address cells be explicitly specified, as it's a
>> bit icky for it to default to 2 in some contexts and 0 in others.
>
> Hmmm. I've not seen that before. On the 5200 the value of
> #address-cells for interrupt controllers has apparently defaulted to
> <0> so I've never encountered or thought about it. I'm not even sure
> what #address-cells != 0 would mean in the context of interrupt
> mapping, or where it would be relevant.
The address component is mainly used in PCI interrupt mapping, where
each slot has a distinct wiring.
It would be weird to see it on a normal interrupt controller, but
explicitly setting it to zero helps avoid someone deciding that an
interrupt controller ought to have a child node for whatever reason
(this was an issue with MPIC), setting address cells to something
non-zero, and messing up interrupt maps.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list