[PATCH RFC] usb gadget: introduce usb_gadget_probe_driver
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Sat Jul 31 01:28:04 EST 2010
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:14:46PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c
> > index 731150d..c266c1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c
> > @@ -1954,13 +1954,14 @@ static int setup_ep0(struct udc *dev)
> > }
> >
> > /* Called by gadget driver to register itself */
> > -int usb_gadget_register_driver(struct usb_gadget_driver *driver)
> > +int usb_gadget_probe_driver(struct usb_gadget_driver *driver,
> > + int (*bind)(struct usb_gadget *))
> > {
> > struct udc *dev = udc;
> > int retval;
> > u32 tmp;
> >
> > - if (!driver || !driver->bind || !driver->setup
> > + if (!driver || bind || !driver->setup
>
> Is it intentional that !driver->bind has become just bind in this case?
> That doesn't seem to happen in the other cases.
Yes, this is what the patch is about. bind got a parameter to the probe
function. This is used in favour of driver->bind to allow driver to
live in .data and bind to live in .init.text without a section mismatch.
So the other cases are broken. I'll recheck.
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list