Large physical address support on e500 platform
kodiakuppercut at gmail.com
Fri Jan 22 17:27:58 EST 2010
> > Its possible that we've broken module/vmalloc support with
> > "Large physical addressing".? Its not something I've
> > tried in a while.? What kernel/git SHA are you using.
>I'm just pulling in from the main kernel tree git.
>My current version is 2.6.33-rc4-00193-gd1e4922-dirty,
>but it had not changed since 2.6.33-rc2
>I started from 2.6.32, but I don't remember if I had a large PA
>support enabled there.
Just to second this issue, the following commit is what broke this:
I didn't have time to delve into the whys & hows, but this commit
caused the same issue on an 8572 platform.
Reverting this one change allows everything (including 36-bit memory
access) to work correctly, as before.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev