[PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: Add support for ram filesystems in FIT uImages
Peter Korsgaard
jacmet at sunsite.dk
Mon Jan 4 01:27:00 EST 2010
>>>>> "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> writes:
Hi,
>> No, that would break stuff for the existing users. The existing format
>> make/file names shouldn't change.
Wolfgang> Well, with this argument you can block all progress and freeze all
Wolfgang> development to some ancient state.
We only break backwards compatibility when we have to. There's no
technical reason for renaming the existing make targets.
>> The FIT images could be called fitimage or uImage.new or something.
Wolfgang> I disagree. We want to make this the new default, so let's
Wolfgang> use the default name for this, and continue to support he
Wolfgang> legacy image format using another name.
Wolfgang> Also, your approach does not scale. Assume we come up with an
Wolfgang> even more advanced image format in the future - how should we
Wolfgang> name it then? "uImage.newer" ? "uImage.verynew" ?
Wolfgang> "uImage.new2" ?
Hence fitimage. The next thing will presumably be called something else
again.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list