[PATCH 1/1] NDFC: add support for alternate ECC format for ndfc
Sean MacLennan
smaclennan at pikatech.com
Tue Feb 23 16:41:56 EST 2010
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:21:53 -0800
"Feng Kan" <fkan at amcc.com> wrote:
> Hi Sean:
>
> I will withdraw this patch. I had a talk with the U-Boot guys. The
> reason for this patch was to support those guys that had their ECC
> ordering at (213) on the older version of the kernel. Upgrading to
> (123) may be problematic. Since without a jtag it would be a bit
> complex.
> I still think this NAND_ECC_SMC define is somewhat missleading. Given
> that both 1-2-3 and 2-1-3 are supported by the correction routine.
The 213 ordering is my fault. I changed it to match what u-boot did
rather than keeping the order from the old arch-ppc driver. Believe
me, I have been raked over the coals at work for this :(
I agree the NAND_ECC_SMC is misleading. The NAND_ECC_SMC *is* correct.
The confusion is that the SMC is handled later on, so you must keep the
byte order unaltered in this routine.
I wrote a simple driver that allows you to boot with the old kernel,
insmod the driver, burn new images (including a kernel with the correct
byte order!), and then reboot into the new kernel. If anybody wants
this, just ask. It will take a little work to get it working with other
NANDs since it needs to know the NAND name to get the mtd structure.
It also assumes you have a way to write to NAND in user mode. The
mtd-utils flash_eraseall and nandwrite are good enough.
Cheers,
Sean
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list