Stack size protection broken on ppc64
Anton Blanchard
anton at samba.org
Sat Feb 6 15:20:38 EST 2010
Hi,
> On recent ppc64 kernels, limiting the stack (using 'ulimit -s blah') is
> now more restrictive than it was before. On 2.6.31 with 4k pages I
> could run 'ulimit -s 16; /usr/bin/test' without a problem. Now with
> mainline, even 'ulimit -s 64; /usr/bin/test' gets killed.
>
> Using 64k pages is even worse. I can't even run '/bin/ls' with a 1MB
> stack (ulimit -s 1024; /bin/ls). Hence, it seems new kernels are too
> restrictive, rather than the old kernels being too liberal.
It looks like this is causing it:
#define EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES 20 /* random */
...
#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
stack_base = vma->vm_end + EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE;
#else
stack_base = vma->vm_start - EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE;
#endif
Which got added back in 2005 in a memory overcommit patch. It only took 5
years for us to go back and review that random setting :)
The comment from Andries explains the purpose:
(1) It reserves a reasonable amount of virtual stack space (amount
randomly chosen, no guarantees given) when the process is started, so
that the common utilities will not be killed by segfault on stack
extension.
This explains why 64kB is much worse. The extra stack reserve should be in kB
and we also need to be careful not to ask for more than our rlimit.
Anton
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list