[PATCH] powerpc: Reduce footprint of xics_ipi_struct
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Feb 1 16:18:30 EST 2010
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 21:58 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Index: linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-cpumask.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h 2010-01-12 12:36:47.174226189 +1100
> +++ linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h 2010-01-12 12:36:47.432976459 +1100
> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
>
> typedef struct {
> unsigned int __softirq_pending;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_XICS) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> + unsigned long xics_ipi;
> +#endif
> } ____cacheline_aligned irq_cpustat_t;
This is still a gross abuse of irq_cpustat_t ... Can't we do
a separate DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(unsigned long, xics_ipi)
inside xics.c instead ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat);
> Index: linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-cpumask.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c 2010-01-12 12:36:46.905477650 +1100
> +++ linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c 2010-01-12 12:40:54.782975198 +1100
> @@ -514,15 +514,12 @@ static void __init xics_init_host(void)
> /*
> * XICS only has a single IPI, so encode the messages per CPU
> */
> -struct xics_ipi_struct {
> - unsigned long value;
> - } ____cacheline_aligned;
> -
> -static struct xics_ipi_struct xics_ipi_message[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;
>
> static inline void smp_xics_do_message(int cpu, int msg)
> {
> - set_bit(msg, &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value);
> + unsigned long *tgt = &(per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).xics_ipi);
> +
> + set_bit(msg, tgt);
> mb();
> if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
> lpar_qirr_info(cpu, IPI_PRIORITY);
> @@ -548,25 +545,23 @@ void smp_xics_message_pass(int target, i
>
> static irqreturn_t xics_ipi_dispatch(int cpu)
> {
> + unsigned long *tgt = &(per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).xics_ipi);
> +
> WARN_ON(cpu_is_offline(cpu));
>
> mb(); /* order mmio clearing qirr */
> - while (xics_ipi_message[cpu].value) {
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION,
> - &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> + while (*tgt) {
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION, tgt)) {
> smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION);
> }
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE,
> - &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE, tgt)) {
> smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE);
> }
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE,
> - &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE, tgt)) {
> smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE);
> }
> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUGGER) || defined(CONFIG_KEXEC)
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK,
> - &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK, tgt)) {
> smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK);
> }
> #endif
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list