[PATCH][GIT PULL] powerpc64/tracing: Add frame buffer to calls of trace_hardirqs_on/off
Steven Rostedt
rostedt at goodmis.org
Sun Dec 26 08:04:03 EST 2010
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 08:11 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 00:46 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/irqflags.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > ---------------------------
> > commit 5025019505da6731f8be13940bb978617599c935
> > Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt at redhat.com>
> > Date: Thu Dec 23 21:07:39 2010 -0800
> >
> > powerpc64/tracing: Add frame buffer to calls of trace_hardirqs_on/off
> >
> > When an interrupt occurs in userspace, we can call trace_hardirqs_on/off()
> > With one level stack. But if we have irqsoff tracing enabled,
> > it checks both CALLER_ADDR0 and CALLER_ADDR1. The second call
> > goes two stack frames up. If this is from user space, then there may
> > not exist a second stack.
> >
> > Add a second stack when calling trace_hardirqs_on/off() otherwise
> > the following oops might occur:
>
> Hrm... this is really gross :-) So we add gratuituous overhead because
> the code below is dumb :-) What about making the code less stupid
> instead when poking at the stack and detect it's coming from userspace
> instead ?
Note, when CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACE is set, there's already a bit of
overhead :-)
Anyway, I'll have to take a look at how the frame pointer is set up. Or
we could also set up all stacks coming into the kernel to have a "dummy"
frame pointer that wont hurt anything if we index into it.
Anyway, I'm off till the new year, so I'll worry about it then ;-)
-- Steve
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list