MPC831x (and others?) NAND erase performance improvements

Scott Wood scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Dec 9 07:25:51 EST 2010


On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:11:08 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se> wrote:

> Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote on 2010/12/08 20:59:28:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:57:03 +0100
> > Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se> wrote:
> >
> > > Can you think of any workaround such as not connecting the BUSY pin at all?
> >
> > Maybe connect the busy pin to a gpio?
> 
> Is BUSY required for sane operation or it an optimization?

You could probably get away without it by inserting delays if you know
the chip specs well enough.

> Is there any risk that the NAND device will drive the LB and corrupt
> the bus for other devices?

I think the only thing the NAND chip should be driving is the busy pin,
until nCE and nRE are lowered.

-Scott



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list