[PATCH 6/9] RapidIO: Add switch-specific sysfs initialization callback
Micha Nelissen
micha at neli.hopto.org
Mon Aug 16 22:25:48 EST 2010
Alexandre Bounine wrote:
> - if (!rdev->rswitch)
> - goto out;
> -
Is it safe? All devices have a switch?
> @@ -63,10 +59,11 @@ struct device_attribute rio_dev_attrs[] = {
> __ATTR_RO(asm_did),
> __ATTR_RO(asm_vid),
> __ATTR_RO(asm_rev),
> - __ATTR_RO(routes),
> __ATTR_NULL,
> };
>
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(routes, S_IRUGO, routes_show, NULL);
> +
This seems a separate change from the sw_sysfs? Why make it separate?
> */
> struct rio_switch {
> @@ -256,6 +257,7 @@ struct rio_switch {
> u8 *sw_domain);
> int (*em_init) (struct rio_dev *dev);
> int (*em_handle) (struct rio_dev *dev, u8 swport);
> + int (*sw_sysfs) (struct rio_dev *dev, int create);
> struct rio_dev *nextdev[0];
> };
Why not make a sw_sysfs_create and sw_sysfs_remove? Is better for
readability. Now you call 'sw_sysfs(dev, 0)' or 'sw_sysfs(dev, 1)';
Micha
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list