[alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add platform registration for ALSA SoC drivers
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Apr 29 10:52:02 EST 2010
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 17:13 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
> > The sound0 node needs a compatible value,
>
> I knew I was forgetting something
>
> > the sound-device node should
> > probably have one too.
>
> The aliases, cpus, and memory node don't have a compatible property,
> and I was modeling the design after the aliases node.
aliases is a bad choice, it's very very special and is neither a device
nor a virtual device, like chosen.
cpus is more of a match in your case.
In any case, I agree, you may not really need a compatible prop for the
virtual device. In fact, Grant, do we really need an enclosing node like
that ? In any case, it's no big deal and shouldn't have much impact on
the design.
Cheers,
Ben.
> > The sound0 node should have something board specific like
> > "fsl,mpc8610hpcd-sound" to make it clear that the binding really only
> > applies to this particular board. It would also be a good idea to
> > prefix all of the property names with 'fsl,' to avoid conflicting with
> > any future common bindings or conventions. Other boards can use the
> > same binding, but they would get a different compatible value (the
> > driver could bind on both).
>
> The aliases node doesn't have an fsl, prefix. I understand the need
> for the prefix, but I wonder why we don't do that for the aliases
> node.
>
> > I'm not a huge fan of the name "sound-devices" for the parent node.
> > There are other sorts of things that we need 'virtual' device nodes to
> > describe. It would be nice to have a single place for collecting
> > nodes for stuff like this. Perhaps this:
> >
> > system {
> > compatible = "system-devices";
> > sound0 {
> > compatible = "fsl,mpc8610hpcd-sound";
> > fsl,ssi = &ssi0;
> > fsl,playback-dma = &dma00;
> > fsl,capture-dma = &dma01;
> > fsl,codec = &cs4270;
> > };
> > };
>
> I like that.
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list