[PATCH] Re: [405EX] Bad page map in process ...
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Sep 22 20:13:46 EST 2009
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 20:07 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 11:29 +0200, Weirich, Bernhard wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found the cause of the problem.
> > My architecture does not define the _PAGE_SPECIAL macro, thus in pte-common.h line 32, it is defined as 0
> > And then in line 180, since _PAGE_SPECIAL is defined, the macro __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL is erroneously defined.
> > This makes any ppc architecture to act as if it has a pte special bit!
> > I suggest the following simple patch to fix this.
>
> Thank ! That looks indeed like a bug.
>
> Note that with 2.6.32, we should be able to use 0x20 as _PAGE_SPECIAL on
> 40x which would improve performances in some areas.
I had a quick look at it seems like 2.6.30 also has that bit free. In
fact, 8xx also appears to have a few bits free.
Maybe we should just define _PAGE_SPECIAL for all the "missing"
processor types (I think that's really the only 2 ones) and remove
the condition around #define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
Care to send a patch ? :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> > Bernhard WEIRICH
> > Software Development
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Weirich <bernhard.weirich at riedel.net>
> > --- linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h 2009-09-16 11:23:44.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h 2009-09-22 11:13:08.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
> > #define HAVE_PAGE_AGP
> >
> > /* Advertise support for _PAGE_SPECIAL */
> > -#ifdef _PAGE_SPECIAL
> > +#if _PAGE_SPECIAL != 0
> > #define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
> > #endif
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> > Linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
> > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list