[RFC] powerpc/irq: Add generic API for setting up cascaded IRQs

[Michael Ellerman]

On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 20:02 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > I'm a reverse polish kind of guy.  I preferring 'subject'_'action'
> > over 'action'_'subject' just because it groups like subjects together.
> >  But it doesn't matter much, especially in this case where 'subject'
> > is in a group of exactly 1.  :-)
> > 
> > I'll do whichever you prefer.
> 
> I just caught myself calling something relocs_check instead of
> check_relocs so I suppose it's fair game :-)

Yeah but that sounds stupid :)

> Whatever you want.

I want a pony. And setup_cascade() is definitely better IMHO.

cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20090915/3268b074/attachment.pgp>