AW: PowerPC PCI DMA issues (prefetch/coherency?)

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 09:43 -0400, Tom Burns wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> With the default config for the Sequoia board on 2.6.24, calling 
> pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu() results in executing
> invalidate_dcache_range() in arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S from __dma_sync().  
> This OOPses on PPC440 since it tries to call directly the assembly 
> instruction dcbi, which can only be executed in supervisor mode.  We 
> tried that before resorting to manual cache line management with 
> usermode-safe assembly calls.

Wait a minute.... usermode ? You are doing all of that from userspace ?
I don't understand the story here. You can't call all those kernel APIs
form userspace in the first place, indeed... But then an IDE driver has
nothing to do in userspace neither.

Cheers,
Ben.

> Regards,
> Tom Burns
> International Datacasting Corporation
> 
> Mikhail Zolotaryov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why manage cache lines  manually, if appropriate code is a part of 
> > __dma_sync / dma_sync_single_for_device of DMA API ? (implies 
> > CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE enabled, as default for Sequoia Board)
> >
> > Prodyut Hazarika wrote:
> >> Hi Adam,
> >>
> >>  
> >>> Yes, I am using the 440EPx (same as the sequoia board). Our 
> >>> ideDriver is DMA'ing blocks of 192-byte data over the PCI bus
> >>>     
> >> (using
> >>  
> >>> the Sil0680A PCI-IDE bridge). Most of the DMA's (depending on timing)
> >>> end up being partially corrupted when we try to parse the data in the
> >>> virtual page. We have confirmed the data is good before the PCI-IDE
> >>> bridge. We are creating two 8K pages and map them to physical DMA
> >>>     
> >> memory
> >>  
> >>> using single-entry scatter/gather structs. When a DMA block is
> >>> corrupted, we see a random portion of it (always a multiple of 16byte
> >>> cache lines) is overwritten with old data from the last time the
> >>>     
> >> buffer
> >>  
> >>> was used.     
> >>
> >> This looks like a cache coherency problem.
> >> Can you ensure that the TLB entries corresponding to the DMA region has
> >> the CacheInhibit bit set.
> >> You will need a BDI connected to your system.
> >>
> >> Also, you will need to invalidate and flush the lines appropriately,
> >> since in 440 cores,
> >> L1Cache coherency is managed entirely by software.
> >> Please look at drivers/net/ibm_newemac/mal.c and core.c for example on
> >> how to do it.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Prodyut
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 13:27 -0700, Prodyut Hazarika wrote:
> >>  
> >>> Hi Adam,
> >>>
> >>>    
> >>>> Are you sure there is L2 cache on the 440?
> >>>>       
> >>> It depends on the SoC you are using. SoC like 460EX (Canyonlands
> >>>     
> >> board)
> >>  
> >>> have L2Cache.
> >>> It seems you are using a Sequoia board, which has a 440EPx SoC. 440EPx
> >>> has a 440 cpu core, but no L2Cache.
> >>> Could you please tell me which SoC you are using?
> >>> You can also refer to the appropriate dts file to see if there is L2C.
> >>> For example, in canyonlands.dts (460EX based board), we have the L2C
> >>> entry.
> >>>         L2C0: l2c {
> >>>               ...
> >>>         }
> >>>
> >>>    
> >>>> I am seeing this problem with our custom IDE driver which is based on
> >>>>       
> >>
> >>  
> >>>> pretty old code. Our driver uses pci_alloc_consistent() to allocate
> >>>>       
> >> the
> >>  
> >>>> physical DMA memory and alloc_pages() to allocate a virtual page. 
> >>>> It then uses pci_map_sg() to map to a scatter/gather buffer. 
> >>>> Perhaps I should convert these to the DMA API calls as you suggest.
> >>>>       
> >>> Could you give more details on the consistency problem? It is a good
> >>> idea to change to the new DMA APIs, but pci_alloc_consistent() should
> >>> work too
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Prodyut   
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 19:57 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>>    
> >>>> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 09:05 +0100, Chris Pringle wrote:
> >>>>      
> >>>>> Hi Adam,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you have a look in include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h for the following
> >>>>>         
> >>> section:
> >>>    
> >>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_44x
> >>>>> #define _PAGE_BASE    (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_ACCESSED |
> >>>>>         
> >>> _PAGE_GUARDED)
> >>>    
> >>>>> #else
> >>>>> #define _PAGE_BASE    (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_ACCESSED)
> >>>>> #endif
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Try adding _PAGE_COHERENT to the appropriate line above and see if
> >>>>>         
> >>> that    
> >>>>> fixes your issue - this causes the 'M' bit to be set on the page
> >>>>>         
> >>> which    
> >>>>> sure enforce cache coherency. If it doesn't, you'll need to check
> >>>>>         
> >>> the    
> >>>>> 'M' bit isn't being masked out in head_44x.S (it was originally
> >>>>>         
> >>> masked    
> >>>>> out on arch/powerpc, but was fixed in later kernels when the cache
> >>>>>         
> >>
> >>  
> >>>>> coherency issues with non-SMP systems were resolved).
> >>>>>         
> >>>> I have some doubts about the usefulness of doing that for 4xx.
> >>>>       
> >> AFAIK,
> >>  
> >>>> the 440 core just ignores M.
> >>>>
> >>>> The problem lies probably elsewhere. Maybe the L2 cache coherency
> >>>>       
> >>> isn't
> >>>    
> >>>> enabled or not working ?
> >>>>
> >>>> The L1 cache on 440 is simply not coherent, so drivers have to make
> >>>>       
> >>> sure
> >>>    
> >>>> they use the appropriate DMA APIs which will do cache flushing when
> >>>> needed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Adam, what driver is causing you that sort of problems ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Ben.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev