[PATCH 2/8] bitmap: Introduce bitmap_set, bitmap_clear, bitmap_find_next_zero_area

[Akinobu Mita]

>> >> --- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
>> >> +++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
>> >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ again:
>> >>       index = (index + align_mask) & ~align_mask;
>> >>
>> >>       end = index + nr;
>> >> -     if (end >= size)
>> >> +     if (end > size)
>> >
>> > I think that this is intentional; the last byte of the limit doesn't
>> > work.
>>
>> It looks ok to me. Without above change, find_next_zero_area cannot
>> find a 64 bits zeroed area in next sample code.
>
> I meant that we don't want to find such area for IOMMUs (IIRC, it code
> came from POWER IOMMU).

OK, I see.  I think we need the comment about it.

So we cannot replace find_next_zero_area by bitmap_find_next_zero_area
and current -mmotm has the bug introduced by this patch in iommu-helper
and I also introduced the bug in bitmap_find_next_zero_area if
align_mask != 0 in
bitmap-introduce-bitmap_set-bitmap_clear-bitmap_find_next_zero_area-fix.patch

Andrew, please drop

lib-iommu-helperc-fix-off-by-one-error-in-find_next_zero_area.patch
iommu-helper-simplify-find_next_zero_area.patch
bitmap-introduce-bitmap_set-bitmap_clear-bitmap_find_next_zero_area.patch
bitmap-introduce-bitmap_set-bitmap_clear-bitmap_find_next_zero_area-fix.patch
iommu-helper-use-bitmap-library.patch
isp1362-hcd-use-bitmap_find_next_zero_area.patch
mlx4-use-bitmap_find_next_zero_area.patch
sparc-use-bitmap_find_next_zero_area.patch
ia64-use-bitmap_find_next_zero_area.patch
genalloc-use-bitmap_find_next_zero_area.patch

I'll overhaul the patchset and retry again.