[PATCH 4/4] powerpc/fsl: 85xx: add cache-sram support

Kumar Gala kumar.gala at freescale.com
Tue Oct 6 01:47:35 EST 2009

On Oct 5, 2009, at 2:15 AM, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:

>> From: Gala Kumar-B11780
>> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:08 AM
>>> +	mbar(1);
>> why isn't eieio() sufficient here?
> When I initially added / tested cache SRAM for P2020RDB, its RM talked
> about using mbar() though mbar(1) is identical to eieio() opcode-wise.
> Also as cache-sram works only for 85xx derivatives, so I picked mbar()
> instead of eieio.

Let use eieio since there is no reason to special case the usage here  
for mbar(1)

- k

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list