[PATCH 06/11] of/flattree: merge early_init_devtree() and early_init_move_devtree()
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Nov 26 15:04:08 EST 2009
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 01:19 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node,
> - const char *uname, int depth,
> - void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_cpus(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> + int depth, void *data)
> {
So now you make this one non-static as well with little hope of making
it static ever again
> static int logical_cpuid;
> char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> @@ -113,8 +112,8 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen_arch(unsigned long node)
> /* No Microblaze specific code here */
> }
>
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node,
> - const char *uname, int depth, void *data)
> +int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> + int depth, void *data)
> {
And this one
> char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> u32 *reg, *endp;
> @@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ static inline unsigned long phyp_dump_calculate_reserve_size(void)
> * without reserving anything. The memory in case of dump being
> * active is freed when the dump is collected (by userland tools).
> */
> -static void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
> +void __init phyp_dump_reserve_mem(void)
> {
And this one...
> /**
> + * early_init_move_devtree - move tree to an unused area, if needed.
> + *
> + * The device tree may be allocated beyond our memory limit, or inside the
> + * crash kernel region for kdump. If so, move it out of the way.
> + */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC)
> +static void __init early_init_move_devtree(void)
And you still end up with an ifdef mess in the common code ...
Would it be possible instead to have one common early_init_devtree()
that calls into the "common" ones (which you can then make static again,
inside the common code) and then calls one arch_early_init_devtree()
which regroups the arch specific ones ?
Or there's too many ordering issues ?
Another option then is to call from that early_init_devtree() something
like:
arch_early_init_dt_mem()
arch_early_init_dt_cpu()
arch_early_init_move_devtree()
etc... in the right spots in the common code and have the archs who
don't do anything there just have them as empty inlines.
Cheers,
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list