[PATCH] mpc5200/gpt: tiny fix for gpt period limitation

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Fri Nov 13 11:21:03 EST 2009


On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang at pengutronix.de> wrote:
>> up patch 3.  BUT, you're on my shit list.  Patch 2 in your series
>
> Huh, are you in a bad mood today? IMHO he addressed some valid issues; and we
> all had to start somewhere regarding the workflow. I know that manually
> adapting patches is annoying, but this wording sounds quite strong...

Albrecht has been around for a bit now.  He does good work, responds
to comments, and in general shows good taste.  This particular case
was just a bit sloppy.  The patch was damaged on the mailing list and
it conflicted with his other patches.  I know he knows better.

Albrecht, I'm not actually mad at you, and I'm sorry for the harsh
working.  The patch series is good work.  I wouldn't have picked it up
if it was otherwise.  I'm just a little annoyed about something I know
you can handle better.  I don't bear any ill will.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list