[PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole

Markus Gutschke markus at chromium.org
Thu May 7 04:42:29 EST 2009


On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:23, Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org
> wrote:

> And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a
> 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ seccomp. It
> does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but it might not be
> used anywhere.
>

In the Linux version of Google Chrome, we are currently working on code that
will use seccomp for parts of our sandboxing solution.


Markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20090506/3c2f03e2/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list