[PATCH] ucc_geth: Rework the TX logic.
Joakim Tjernlund
Joakim.Tjernlund at transmode.se
Tue Mar 31 05:42:28 EST 2009
Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote on 30/03/2009 19:45:17:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote on 30/03/2009 19:22:03:
> >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>> gianfar does not seem to use in_/out_ functions for the BDs. Works
> > just
> >>> fine that too it seems.
> >> It does now that it has explicit barriers in a few places. Before
they
> >
> > In 2.6.29 or later?
>
> No, it was earlier.
Ah, I see now. The eieio() stuff.
>
> >> were added, it would sometimes fail under load. That was due to a
> >> compiler reordering, but CPU reordering was possible as well.
> >
> > Does not the CPU skip reordering if the guarded bit is set?
>
> The guarded bit is typically not set for DMA buffers. ucc_geth is a bit
> different since descriptors are in MURAM which is ioremap()ed -- though
> switching to a cacheable mapping with barriers should be a performance
> improvement.
I always thought that MURAM was very fast. The whole reason to have BDs in
MURAM is that it is faster than normal RAM, at least that is what I
thought.
Jocke
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list