[PATCH] eHEA: Don't do memory allocation under lock if not necessary
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Mar 11 15:10:41 EST 2009
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 16:36 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> In ehea_probe_adapter() the initial memory allocation and initialisation does
> not need to be done with the ehea_fw_handles.lock semaphore held. Doing so
> extends the amount of time the lock is held unnecessarily.
Can you resend with netdev on CC ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
> index dfe9226..34480ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
> @@ -3370,18 +3370,19 @@ static int __devinit ehea_probe_adapter(struct of_device *dev,
> ehea_error("Invalid ibmebus device probed");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
>
> adapter = kzalloc(sizeof(*adapter), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!adapter) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "no mem for ehea_adapter\n");
> - goto out;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - list_add(&adapter->list, &adapter_list);
> -
> adapter->ofdev = dev;
> + adapter->pd = EHEA_PD_ID;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
> +
> + list_add(&adapter->list, &adapter_list);
>
> adapter_handle = of_get_property(dev->node, "ibm,hea-handle",
> NULL);
> @@ -3395,8 +3396,6 @@ static int __devinit ehea_probe_adapter(struct of_device *dev,
> goto out_free_ad;
> }
>
> - adapter->pd = EHEA_PD_ID;
> -
> dev->dev.driver_data = adapter;
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list