Next 10: Badness at mm/allocpercpu.c:123

Sachin P. Sant sachinp at in.ibm.com
Wed Mar 11 01:12:34 EST 2009


While booting Next 20090310 on a powerpc box (Power6 9117-MMA)
i observed the following badness :

[    0.339662] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.339666] Badness at mm/allocpercpu.c:123
[    0.339670] NIP: c0000000001129dc LR: c0000000001129b8 CTR: 0000000000000000
[    0.339676] REGS: c0000000fe1efa10 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (2.6.29-rc7-next-20090310)
[    0.339681] MSR: 8000000000029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR>  CR: 24000024  XER: 20000002
[    0.339695] TASK = c0000000fe1dd3d0[1] 'swapper' THREAD: c0000000fe1ec000 CPU: 0
[    0.339701] GPR00: 0000000000000001 c0000000fe1efc90 c000000000948660 c0000000fe019000
[    0.339711] GPR04: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000000fe019080 c00000000122e980
[    0.339721] GPR08: 0000000000000000 c000000001467dec c0000000fe0e2610 c0000000fe1dd3d0
[    0.339732] GPR12: 0000000044000022 c000000000a22300 c000000000733ad0 c00000000065e0c5
[    0.339742] GPR16: 0000000003c33a08 0000000000000000 c000000000733a08 0000000002f1fc90
[    0.339752] GPR20: c000000000733a20 c000000000679b30 0000000000000000 0000000002f1fc90
[    0.339763] GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c000000000670ccd 0000000000000001
[    0.339773] GPR28: c0000000fe019000 0000000000000080 c0000000008cb908 0000000000000100
[    0.339788] NIP [c0000000001129dc] .__alloc_percpu+0x7c/0x244
[    0.339793] LR [c0000000001129b8] .__alloc_percpu+0x58/0x244
[    0.339798] Call Trace:
[    0.339801] [c0000000fe1efc90] [c0000000001129b8] .__alloc_percpu+0x58/0x244 (unreliable)
[    0.339810] [c0000000fe1efdc0] [c00000000007ce84] .__create_workqueue_key+0x74/0x2a0
[    0.339819] [c0000000fe1efe70] [c000000000716990] .cpuset_init_smp+0x78/0xa4
[    0.339827] [c0000000fe1eff00] [c000000000700334] .kernel_init+0x16c/0x224
[    0.339834] [c0000000fe1eff90] [c00000000002adc8] .kernel_thread+0x54/0x70
[    0.339839] Instruction dump:
[    0.339843] 3863007f 78630624 4bffb94d 60000000 2bbd0008 7c7c1b78 40fd0030 e93e8010
[    0.339856] 80090000 7c000034 5400d97e 78000020 <0b000000> 2fa00000 41fe0010 e93e8010

I have attached the dmesg log here.

Next 20090306 had the same problem, while 20090305 did not.

Thanks
-Sachin

-- 

---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: dmesg_next_20090310
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20090310/b116491f/attachment.asc>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list