83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as Cache-Inhibited
    Ben Menchaca 
    ben.menchaca at gmail.com
       
    Sun Mar  8 14:15:13 EST 2009
    
    
  
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <
benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 10:12 -0600, Ben Menchaca wrote:
> > Testing now...it looks like it (almost) works, though!  Why does
> > setting no-snoop cause snooping to work?  More on the effect on
> > setting that bit in a few minutes...need more testing.
>
> Maybe they got the documentation for that bit backward ? :-)
For posterity...it does appear that this is the case.  I don't have a bus
analyzer to watch the transaction, but a JTAG trigger caught the update
happening if and only if bit 3 was set in the (R|W)DMA descriptor.  My FAE
at FS said he is watching this thread, so hopefully some doc errata can be
generated so others can avoid my confusion :-).
- Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20090307/d3190d8d/attachment.htm>
    
    
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list