83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as Cache-Inhibited
Liu Dave-R63238
DaveLiu at freescale.com
Fri Mar 6 16:40:50 EST 2009
what is the value of ACR register?
________________________________
From: Ben Menchaca [mailto:ben.menchaca at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:38 PM
To: Liu Dave-R63238
Cc: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: 83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as
Cache-Inhibited
1. BAT2 in linux is set to WIMG=0010, and covers all 64M
2. PEX_DEVICE_CONTROL in PCI-E Config Space (0x54): 0x1020
3. PEX_xDMA_CTRL is set to 0x00000401 at the initiation of the
DMA.
4. OWAR0 is set to 0xFFFFF005, so NSNP is 0.
5. The DMA descriptor (randomly chosen when I hit a
trigger...just ignore the size...) contains 0002AFF3 at offset 0, so
nosnoops are cleared.
Core is 400MHz, and CSB is 133MHz.
- Ben
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Liu Dave-R63238
<DaveLiu at freescale.com> wrote:
and what settings is DMA description bit 3?
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu
<mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces%2Bdaveliu> =freescale.com at ozlabs.org]
> On Behalf Of Liu Dave-R63238
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:22 PM
> To: Ben Menchaca; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: 83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as
Cache-Inhibited
>
> Did you enable the snoop bit at PEX_WDMA_CTRL[SNOOP]
and
> PEX_RDMA_CTRL[SNOOP]?
>
> What is the freq settings? CORE/CSB bus.
>
> Thanks, Dave
>
> ________________________________
>
> From:
linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu
<mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces%2Bdaveliu> =freescale.com at ozlabs.org]
> On Behalf Of Ben Menchaca
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:33 PM
> To: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> Subject: 83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as
Cache-Inhibited
>
>
> I am working on a Freescale 8314e design, and
the
> embedded device is configured as a PCI-e endpoint
running a
> 2.6.27-5 kernel. For context, we have written a
kernel
> module which, among other things, uses the RDMA/WDMA
engine
> in the PCI-e IP block. On the host side, these DMAs
are
> coherent. However, on the embedded side, things are
quite a
> bit less rosy; we must manually flush/invalidate cache
lines
> for WDMA/RDMAs to occur successfully. After speaking
with
> (several) FAEs at Freescale, we believe there is a
> configuration issue that is the cause, but we have yet
to
> have anyone successfully point to it.
>
> Disabling the data cache altogether resolves the
issue
> entirely, but of course, also completely tanks
performance.
> As a temporary workaround, I would like to simply mark
the
> pages (obtained currently via dma_alloc_coherent)
involved as
> cache-inhibited. I have attempted to do this via some
> snippets remaining in fec.c (va_to_pte, uncache_pte to
set
> _PAGE_NO_CACHE, flush_tlb_page, then unmap_pte), but
this is
> almost certainly braindead; va_to_pte is not a part of
the
> 83xx source, as far as I can tell; 8xx only.
>
> A quick pointer in the correct direction for
marking
> pages as cache-inhibited on a 2.6.27-5 kernel would be
> appreciated, or if my approach to a workaround is
flawed, a
> pointer to the correct way would be great.
>
> Ben Menchaca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20090306/fb1e83d5/attachment.htm>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list