[PATCH v4] 83xx: add support for the kmeter1 board.

[David Gibson]

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:27:42AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello David,
> 
> David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >> The following series implements basic board support for
> >> the kmeter1 board from keymile, based on a MPC8360.
> > 
> > [snip]
> >> +		par_io at 1400 {
> >> +			reg = <0x1400 0x100>;
> >> +			device_type = "par_io";
> > 
> > This should have a compatible value instead of a device_type value.
> 
> compatible = "fsl,mpc8360-par_io"; ?

Sounds reasonable, if there isn't an existing precedent to follow.

> > [snip]
> > 
> >> +			num-ports = <7>;
> >> +
> >> +			pio_ucc1: ucc_pin at 00 {
> > 
> > Since these nodes have addresses, they should also have reg
> > properties.  And the parent should have #address-cells and
> > #size-cells.
> 
> added "#address-cells" and "#size-cells", but couldn;t find what
> I should write in a "reg" entry ... I think something like that:
> 
> reg = <0x00 0x01>;

If you just want a plain index number, which is what it seems you have
here, then you'll want #address-cells = 1, #size-cells = 0 and reg
will then have one cell (i.e. 1 u32) with the index number

so 	subnode at 0 {
		reg = <0>;
	}
	subnode at 1 {
		reg = <1>;
	}

Note also that it's usual for the unit addresses (that's the bits
after the @ sign) to be formatted without leading zeroes.

> 
> ?
> 
> > [snip]
> >> +		qe at 100000 {
> >> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> >> +			#size-cells = <1>;
> >> +			device_type = "qe";
> > 
> > This device_type should not be here.
> 
> deleted.

Ok.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson