linux-next: origin tree build failure
Ingo Molnar
mingo at elte.hu
Fri Jun 12 23:49:40 EST 2009
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 23:10 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:53 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > To some extent, here, the issue is on Linus side and it's up to him (Hey
> > Linus ! still listening ?) to maybe be more proactive at giving an ack
> > or nack so that we can get a chance to do that final pass of ironing out
> > the mechanical bugs before we hit the main tree.
>
> Let me add a little bit more background to my reasoning here and why I
> think having this integration testing step is so valuable...
>
> It all boils down to bisection and having a bisectable tree.
I think you are way too concentrated on this particular incident,
and you are generalizing it into something that is not so in
practice.
Even in this particular case, there's just 3 other commit points in
the Git tree between commit 8a1ca8c (the breakage on PowerPC) and
e14112d (the fix). We'll have up to 10,000 commits.
I bisect on an almost daily basis, and i'm not seeing unreasonable
problems.
Ingo
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list