[LTP] msgctl10 fails on Powerpc Linux-2.6.29.6
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Jul 23 11:03:06 EST 2009
On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:32 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala
> <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala
> <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
> The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC
> architecture (ppc440)
>
>
> msgctl10 1 B------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:904!
> Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#9]
>
> I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904. Do you have some
> other patches on top of 2.6.29.6?
>
> - k
>
>
> I have LTTng patches on top of linux-2.6.29.6.
>
> Does it modify traps.c? Can you see what the code around line 904
> looks like and post that.
>
> - k
> 896
> 897 #if defined(CONFIG_XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT) &&
> defined(CONFIG_PPC_FPU)
> 898 if (reason & REASON_ILLEGAL) {
> 899 if (excep_state < 1) {
> 900 excep_state++;
> 901 return;
> 902 }
> 903 /* should never get here */
> 904 BUG();
> 905 }
> 906 #endif
> 907
> 908 /* Try to emulate it if we should. */
>
Are you sure this is coming from the LTTng patches? Which actual
patch makes this change?
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list